How can Dr Carson be leading in a national poll for president and get a pass on a some, well, scientifically suspect beliefs such as “his statement in the wake of the Oregon mass shooting that it would be advisable to attack an armed gunman during a mass shooting ‘because he can’t get us all‘?” Or. how can folks want a president who is doing infomercials on neutraceuticals which misrepresent scientific fact and when called on it, deny having been paid for what was almost certainly a paid gig?
The New York Times gives a plausible answer to this question today. Ishani Ganguli, a Boston internist with an interest in health policy, points out that, pretty much, physicians get a bye:
- He points out that we are trained to speak authoritatively regardless of the certainty of the situation or the strength of the evidence. In other words, as I tell my residents, “patients and attendings smell fear.”
- He points out that surgeons are trained to believe that their skill is what stands between the patient and death and the loss of that faith leads to a crisis, one that a successful surgeon may never experience. He or she may not be good (and there is now a scorecard to look at) but will never admit defeat.
- Doctors should never be politically correct, or so they are portrayed in the media (see House, MD),
- There is a long line of physicians who are given a pass (see Dr Oz for the latest example)
Dr Ganguli points out that we as a society feel the need to ascribe trust to the MD. Our Hippocratic sales pitch has been an effective marketing strategy. He goes on to point out that self reflection and knowing our limits are keys to maintaining this trust. I am afraid that these are qualities Dr Carson does not have.